Manufacturing Loaded Physical Bitcoins Is a Lost Art
One business that was once incredibly popular is the art of manufacturing loaded physical bitcoins. Government regulations have forced operations to cease, causing the physical bitcoin minting business to virtually grind to a halt.
Not long after Bitcoin was launched, people managed to create paper wallets and soon the concept of physical bitcoins was born. After that, individuals took the idea to another level and minted metal bitcoins were created. However, after Mike Caldwell, the creator of Casascius coins, started selling his physical bitcoins loaded with whole units or fractions of BTC , he was shut down by the U.
The U. Since then a number of other manufacturers have attempted to sell loaded bitcoins to investors who may find numismatic value in these physical collections. From , physical bitcoins were extremely popular and demand for these coins has remained robust among collectors. Some rare Casascius coins have sold for more than X their loaded value. In the early days there were so many physical bitcoins that cryptocurrency proponent Elias Ahonen managed to author an entire encyclopedia of physical bitcoins.
In recent years, however, the art of molding loaded physical bitcoins is all but lost. Similarly, the cryptocurrency firm BTCC launched its own physical bitcoin forge and ended its operations in October The mint did manage to produce a series, which is still available to U. In fact, there are plenty of physical bitcoins for sale on secondary markets as third parties have managed to hoard these coins and sell them for a profit.
However, collectors will find that prices are way higher than what the coin was sold for originally and well above what it holds digitally. The biggest reason for most of these firms going out of business is predominately overreaching regulation.
However, issuing physical bitcoins that are loaded or any other type of manufactured bearer bond instrument that competes with the U. This can also happen to coin creators even if the products are minted without digitally loaded value inside them.
On March 18, , the U. Attorney Anne Tompkins did not take kindly to the creation. Denarium sells a variety of pre-funded physical coins in bronze, silver, and even. The pieces are made by a Finnish company called Prasos and private keys are covered by a tamper-resistant hologram. Besides Denarium and overpriced secondary markets, finding physical cryptocurrency manufacturers who are willing to sell coins loaded, unfortunately, is now all but impossible.
What do you think about the lack of physical bitcoin manufacturers in ? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below. Have you seen our widget service? It allows anyone to embed informative Bitcoin. The widgets include price-only, price and graph, price and news, and forum threads.
Like crypto payments provider Bottle Pay, mining pool Simplecoin and interactive bitcoin faucet Chopcoin are shutting down in light of… read more. Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since He has a passion for Bitcoin, open source code, and decentralized applications.
Redman has written thousands of articles for news. Share this story:. Jamie Redman Jamie Redman is a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Dec 18, Dec 13, Dec 6,
News feed continued
And speculative bubble it certainly is, as a non-negotiable, software-constrained supply runs headlong into greater-fool demand. As even greater fools displace the ones before, all participants, foolish or not, increase their focus on the central question of Bitcoin:. Strip away the drivers of extrinsic value, namely its greater-fool demand and its constrained supply, however, and what remains?
Just as gold would retain its luster, malleability, and resistance to tarnishing, thus making it useful for numerous manufacturing and jewelry purposes regardless of its scarcity, one wonders what intrinsic value Bitcoin holds. What is the value of a physical bitcoin would think the answer would be obvious, but instead it is remarkably elusive.
Never before in the history of commerce has a speculative bubble developed around an asset that had no clear intrinsic value. Even tulips — the very symbol of a speculative bubble — are flowers of remarkable beauty. Tulips: the global symbol of speculative bubbles. Plenty of people — both aficionados as well as skeptics — question whether Bitcoin has any intrinsic value whatsoever.
Such consternation appears on all sides of the political spectrum. The reason: The Libertarian belief that money requires a physical basis of value, which is why so many Libertarians want to dissolve the Federal Reserve and return to the gold standard. Jack G. They are not gold in the rough. The conclusion to this questionable line of reasoning is that Bitcoin cannot function as money.
Dollars, for example, are backed by. But what about Bitcoin? But none of these are very satisfying answers. After all, the reason gold has served so well as money throughout history is the combination of both its scarcity as well as its intrinsic value outside of its use as money. Bitcoin lacks such utility. Without intrinsic value, nobody would have assigned Bitcoin a value in the first place. The missing piece of this puzzle — the piece that both Bitcoin fans as well as detractors have missed — is the ability to mine Bitcoin.
Because in theory anyone can put in the effort to create new Bitcoin by processing Bitcoin transactions, it is possible to profit on Bitcoin outside of its use as a medium of exchange. This fact, combined with its enforced scarcity, enable Bitcoin to become such a medium, and thus have value. In fact, the Bitcoin infrastructure is intentionally set up to reward miners: if more miners attempt to create Bitcoin then it automatically becomes more difficult to profit from the process.
Likewise, if fewer miners make the attempt, then it becomes easier to make money this way. However, figuring out this value is a complex task.
The problem: by design, as more Bitcoins are mined, the harder it becomes to mine what is the value of a physical bitcoin. Over time, therefore, the pool of successful miners will continue to shrink, leaving only large, industrial operators with unusually low costs, typically due to government subsidies. The risk inherent in this situation goes well beyond simply the collapse of Bitcoin. Never before in the history of civilization has this happened — where cornering the market on a commodity means gaining the power over its intrinsic value.
Long term, however, the risks underlying Bitcoin are far greater and more difficult to understand. Intellyx publishes the Agile Digital Transformation Roadmap poster, advises companies on their digital transformation initiatives, and helps vendors communicate their agility stories. As of the time of writing, none of the organizations mentioned in this article are Intellyx customers.
Image credit: Maxim Peremojnii. Jason Bloomberg is a leading IT industry analyst, Forbes contributor, keynote speaker, and globally recognized expert on multiple disruptive trends in enterprise tech. I write and consult on digital transformation in the enterprise. As even greater fools displace the ones before, all participants, foolish or not, increase their focus on the central question of Bitcoin: Why does Bitcoin have any value at all?
Where, then, lies the intrinsic value of Bitcoin? Tulips: the global symbol of speculative bubbles Maxim Peremojnii. Jason Bloomberg. Read More.